Commonwealth v. Monteiro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Commonwealth v. Monteiro

886 N.E.2d 123, 451 Mass. 1009, 2008 Mass. LEXIS 245

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 14, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 886 N.E.2d 123 (Commonwealth v. Monteiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Monteiro, 886 N.E.2d 123, 451 Mass. 1009, 2008 Mass. LEXIS 245 (Mass. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

The single justice’s decision, acting as a gatekeeper pursuant to G. L. c. 278, § 33E, is final and unreviewable. Commonwealth v. Scott, 437 Mass. 1008 (2002). Commonwealth v. Ambers, 397 Mass. 705, 710-711 (1986), and cases cited. Monteiro’s assertion that he could not have previously raised his ineffective assistance of counsel claim because his trial and appellate counsel were employed by the same agency, Commonwealth v. Egardo, 426 Mass. 48, 49-50 (1997), “ignores not only the nature of plenary review, see G. L. c. 278, § 33E, but also the single justice’s determination as gatekeeper that the claim of ineffective assistance was not substantial.” Commonwealth v. Herbert, 445 Mass. 1018, 1018-1019 (2005), quoting Commonwealth v. Scott, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Cook, 447 Mass. 1023, 1024 (2007). Monteiro cannot appeal to the full court.

Appeal dismissed.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law. Robert E. Monteiro, pro se. Paul B. Linn, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The single justice’s decision, acting as a gatekeeper pursuant to G. L. c. 278, § 33E, is final and unreviewable. Commonwealth v. Scott, 437 Mass. 1008 (2002). Commonwealth v. Ambers, 397 Mass. 705, 710-711 (1986), and cases cited. Monteiro’s assertion that he could not have previously raised his ineffective assistance of counsel claim because his trial and appellate counsel were employed by the same agency, Commonwealth v. Egardo, 426 Mass. 48, 49-50 (1997), “ignores not only the nature of plenary review, see G. L. c. 278, § 33E, but also the single justice’s determination as gatekeeper that the claim of ineffective assistance was not substantial.” Commonwealth v. Herbert, 445 Mass. 1018, 1018-1019 (2005), quoting Commonwealth v. Scott, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Cook, 447 Mass. 1023, 1024 (2007). Monteiro cannot appeal to the full court.

Appeal dismissed.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law. Robert E. Monteiro, pro se. Paul B. Linn, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 N.E.2d 123, 451 Mass. 1009, 2008 Mass. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-monteiro-mass-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack