Commonwealth v. Montalvo

Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas

Commonwealth v. Montalvo

72 Pa. D. & C.2d 130, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 206

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County

DecidedJune 24, 1975

Docketno. 80 of 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 72 Pa. D. & C.2d 130 (Commonwealth v. Montalvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Montalvo, 72 Pa. D. & C.2d 130, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 206 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

SHUGHART, P. J.,

On August 29, 1974, defendant was cited for a violation of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, sec. 1002(b)(7), 75 P.S. § 1002(b)(7), on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Hopewell Township. Radar operated by a Pennsylvania State Trooper indicated the speed of the tractor-trailer driven by defendant [131]*131to be 67 miles per hour where 55 miles per hour was posted as the maximum for all vehicles. At a hearing before a district justice on November 8, 1974, defendant was found guilty. An appeal from the conviction was taken to this court and a hearing thereon was held January 28, 1975.

In Commonwealth v. Hyman, 69 Criminal 1975 (C. P. of Cumberland County, filed June 24, 1975), we held that the failure of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission to process the resolution of March 5, 1974 (reducing the speed hmit for passenger vehicles to 55 miles per hour), as required by the Commonwealth Documents Law of July 31, 1968, P.L. 769,45 P.S. §§1101, et seq., rendered the resolution invalid. That holding, however, does not provide any support for the position of defendant in the present appeal.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, section 1002(b)(7) of The Vehicle Code clearly allows the Turnpike Commission to restrict vehicles to speeds below 70 miles per hour where official signs are erected.

* Prior to the resolution in question, the commission had promulgated Rule II of the Traffic Regulations for the turnpike which provided:

“Passenger vehicles are limited to a speed of 65 [132]*132miles per hour; all other vehicles to 55 -miles per hour: EXCEPT that where a sign indicates alesser speed NO VEHICLE may exceed the indicated speed.”

It is evident that the only effect of the March 5, 1974 resolution was to reduce the speed for passenger cars. The resolution in no way dealt with the 55 mile-per-hour limit for all other vehicles. Defendant cannot benefit from the invalidity of the resolution relating to passenger vehicles. Defendant’s conviction, therefore, may be sustained, depending upon the resolution of any factual issues raised on appeal.

ORDER

And now, June 24, 1975, a hearing to determine the factual issues involved is fixed for Thursday, July 3, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom No. 1 of the Courthouse in Carlisle.

The Vehicle Code, sec. 1002(b)(7), states:

“(b) [S]peeds in excess of the [following] shall be unlawful:

“(7) Seventy (70) miles an hour speed hmit: All vehicles when being operated on highways under the supervision and control of a turnpike commission, except those restricted by this act to lower maximum speeds, and except when restricted to lower maximum speeds by such turnpike commission or any zones or sections thereof where official signs erected by such turnpike commission on the highway facing the traffic to be controlled are displayed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHUGHART, P. J.,

On August 29, 1974, defendant was cited for a violation of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, sec. 1002(b)(7), 75 P.S. § 1002(b)(7), on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Hopewell Township. Radar operated by a Pennsylvania State Trooper indicated the speed of the tractor-trailer driven by defendant [131]*131to be 67 miles per hour where 55 miles per hour was posted as the maximum for all vehicles. At a hearing before a district justice on November 8, 1974, defendant was found guilty. An appeal from the conviction was taken to this court and a hearing thereon was held January 28, 1975.

In Commonwealth v. Hyman, 69 Criminal 1975 (C. P. of Cumberland County, filed June 24, 1975), we held that the failure of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission to process the resolution of March 5, 1974 (reducing the speed hmit for passenger vehicles to 55 miles per hour), as required by the Commonwealth Documents Law of July 31, 1968, P.L. 769,45 P.S. §§1101, et seq., rendered the resolution invalid. That holding, however, does not provide any support for the position of defendant in the present appeal.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, section 1002(b)(7) of The Vehicle Code clearly allows the Turnpike Commission to restrict vehicles to speeds below 70 miles per hour where official signs are erected.

* Prior to the resolution in question, the commission had promulgated Rule II of the Traffic Regulations for the turnpike which provided:

“Passenger vehicles are limited to a speed of 65 [132]*132miles per hour; all other vehicles to 55 -miles per hour: EXCEPT that where a sign indicates alesser speed NO VEHICLE may exceed the indicated speed.”

It is evident that the only effect of the March 5, 1974 resolution was to reduce the speed for passenger cars. The resolution in no way dealt with the 55 mile-per-hour limit for all other vehicles. Defendant cannot benefit from the invalidity of the resolution relating to passenger vehicles. Defendant’s conviction, therefore, may be sustained, depending upon the resolution of any factual issues raised on appeal.

ORDER

And now, June 24, 1975, a hearing to determine the factual issues involved is fixed for Thursday, July 3, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom No. 1 of the Courthouse in Carlisle.

The Vehicle Code, sec. 1002(b)(7), states:

“(b) [S]peeds in excess of the [following] shall be unlawful:

“(7) Seventy (70) miles an hour speed hmit: All vehicles when being operated on highways under the supervision and control of a turnpike commission, except those restricted by this act to lower maximum speeds, and except when restricted to lower maximum speeds by such turnpike commission or any zones or sections thereof where official signs erected by such turnpike commission on the highway facing the traffic to be controlled are displayed.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 Pa. D. & C.2d 130, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-montalvo-pactcomplcumber-1975.