Commonwealth v. Monarch, S., Pet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Monarch, S., Pet

179 A.3d 3

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 11, 2018

Docket268 WAL 2017 (Granted)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.3d 3 (Commonwealth v. Monarch, S., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Monarch, S., Pet, 179 A.3d 3 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11 ^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Was [petitioner] given impermissible enhanced penalties, as expressed in Birchfield v. North Dakota, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 2160 , 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (June 23, 2016), for his refusal to consent to chemical testing?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11 ^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Was [petitioner] given impermissible enhanced penalties, as expressed in Birchfield v. North Dakota, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 2160 , 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (June 23, 2016), for his refusal to consent to chemical testing?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.3d 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-monarch-s-pet-pa-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack