Commonwealth v. Mizell

356 A.2d 742, 467 Pa. 265, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 585
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 12, 1976
DocketAppeal No. 362
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 A.2d 742 (Commonwealth v. Mizell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Mizell, 356 A.2d 742, 467 Pa. 265, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 585 (Pa. 1976).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 314 A.2d 513 (1974) and Commonwealth v. Jones, 451 Pa. 69, 301 A.2d 811 (1973), appellant’s counsel is hereby ordered to submit a brief on behalf of appellant that complies with the above constitutional mandates and to provide appellant with a copy of the brief. After the filing of a brief in conformity with Anders, Greer and Jones, supra, appellant’s counsel then may seek leave of this Court to withdraw as defense counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Mizell
387 A.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 A.2d 742, 467 Pa. 265, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mizell-pa-1976.