Commonwealth v. Mizell
This text of 356 A.2d 742 (Commonwealth v. Mizell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 314 A.2d 513 (1974) and Commonwealth v. Jones, 451 Pa. 69, 301 A.2d 811 (1973), appellant’s counsel is hereby ordered to submit a brief on behalf of appellant that complies with the above constitutional mandates and to provide appellant with a copy of the brief. After the filing of a brief in conformity with Anders, Greer and Jones, supra, appellant’s counsel then may seek leave of this Court to withdraw as defense counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 A.2d 742, 467 Pa. 265, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mizell-pa-1976.