Commonwealth v. Mizell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Mizell

356 A.2d 742, 467 Pa. 265, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 585

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 12, 1976·No. Appeal No. 362·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 314 A.2d 513 (1974) and Commonwealth v. Jones, 451 Pa. 69, 301 A.2d 811 (1973), appellant’s counsel is hereby ordered to submit a brief on behalf of appellant that complies with the above constitutional mandates and to provide appellant with a copy of the brief. After the filing of a brief in conformity with Anders, Greer and Jones, supra, appellant’s counsel then may seek leave of this Court to withdraw as defense counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 314 A.2d 513 (1974) and Commonwealth v. Jones, 451 Pa. 69, 301 A.2d 811 (1973), appellant’s counsel is hereby ordered to submit a brief on behalf of appellant that complies with the above constitutional mandates and to provide appellant with a copy of the brief. After the filing of a brief in conformity with Anders, Greer and Jones, supra, appellant’s counsel then may seek leave of this Court to withdraw as defense counsel.

Commonwealth v. Mizell, 356 A.2d 742, 467 Pa. 265, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 585 (Pa. 1976).

Pincite

356 A.2d 742 (Commonwealth v. Mizell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related