Commonwealth v. Mitzel
This text of 993 A.2d 872 (Commonwealth v. Mitzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[666]*666 ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).
Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 A.2d 872, 605 Pa. 665, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mitzel-pa-2010.