Commonwealth v. Mitzel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Mitzel

993 A.2d 872

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 26, 2010·No. 200 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resen-tencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resen-tencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Mitzel, 993 A.2d 872 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

993 A.2d 872 (Commonwealth v. Mitzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related