Commonwealth v. Mitzel

993 A.2d 872, 605 Pa. 665, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 845
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 26, 2010
DocketAppeal No. 200 MAL 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 993 A.2d 872 (Commonwealth v. Mitzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Mitzel, 993 A.2d 872, 605 Pa. 665, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 845 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

[666]*666 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Haag
981 A.2d 902 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 A.2d 872, 605 Pa. 665, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mitzel-pa-2010.