Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

249 A.2d 795, 214 Pa. Super. 723, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1514

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 7, 1969·No. Appeal, No. 1112·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Opinion In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order is vacated and the record is remanded to the court below with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined. See Rule 1503(a) of Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Opinion In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order is vacated and the record is remanded to the court below with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined. See Rule 1503(a) of Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 249 A.2d 795, 214 Pa. Super. 723, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1514 (Pa. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

249 A.2d 795 (Commonwealth v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related