Commonwealth v. Miner

27 A.3d 986, 611 Pa. 423, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1904
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 16, 2011·No. 754 EAL 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of August 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The decision below is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Jette, 611 Pa. 166, 23 A.3d 1032 (2011). In addition, the following applications for relief filed by respondent are denied as MOOT: (1) Petition requesting extension of time and to proceed pro se in response to Commonwealth’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal; (2) Petition requesting remand to the PCRA court to conduct a Grazier hearing as to request to *424 proceed pro se; and (3) Petition requesting to remove counsel due to conflict of interest.

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Miner, 27 A.3d 986, 611 Pa. 423, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1904 (Pa. 2011).

27 A.3d 986 (Commonwealth v. Miner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Smith, J., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2025
Commonwealth v. Miner
44 A.3d 684 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)