Commonwealth v. Mincey
This text of 34 Va. Cir. 130 (Commonwealth v. Mincey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alexandria County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s Motion to Suppress must be granted.
The officer testified that he observed the transfer of a dark-colored jeweler’s bag with a light-colored area; based on his training and experience, he thought a $20.00 rock of crack cocaine had been transferred; and that caused the arrest of the Defendant.
The officer was not asked the factual basis for his conclusion that a transfer of á controlled substance had occurred, and no further facts were developed to show the basis for his conclusion. Absent proof of a factual basis upon which to base a finding of probable cause, the evidence obtained as a result of an illegal arrest and search must be suppressed. See, Depriest v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 577, 585 (1987).
The transfer of the jeweler’s bag without a factual explanation as to its significance is insufficient standing alone to justify the arrest and search of the Defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Va. Cir. 130, 1994 Va. Cir. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mincey-vaccalexandria-1994.