Commonwealth v. Mincey
This text of 380 A.2d 361 (Commonwealth v. Mincey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant was convicted in a non-jury trial of voluntary manslaughter and carrying a firearm on a public street. After sentencing and the denial of post-verdict motions, the appellant filed an appeal in this court only as to the voluntary manslaughter conviction.
Appellant contends (1) that a gun introduced into evidence should have been suppressed because it was obtained from the appellant as the result of an arrest without probable cause, and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of voluntary manslaughter.
We have examined the issues raised and find them to be without merit.
Issues raised concerning the firearms conviction are not properly before us since no appeal was filed from that conviction.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
380 A.2d 361, 475 Pa. 294, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mincey-pa-1977.