Commonwealth v. Milspaw

274 A.2d 777, 1 Pa. Commw. 376, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 535
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 9, 1971
DocketNo. 348
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 274 A.2d 777 (Commonwealth v. Milspaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Milspaw, 274 A.2d 777, 1 Pa. Commw. 376, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 535 (Pa. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam

Opinion,

This case involves an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, dated November 2, 1970. This order sustained the appeal of Robert Frank Milspaw (appellee) from the findings of the Secretary of Revenue (now called Secretary of Transportation) suspending appellee’s operator’s license for a period of three months.

The Vehicle Code (Act of August 6, 1963, P. L. 509, as amended, 75 P.S. 620), provides that the Courts of Common Pleas, in appeals arising from the suspension of operator’s licenses, are directed to hear such cases de novo. The Common Pleas judge has the duty to make findings of fact sufficient to support the Order of Court. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jerry M. [378]*378Royer, 213 Pa. Super. 17, 245 A. 2d 716 (1968), Handwork Appeal, 348 Pa. 263, 35 A. 2d 289 (1944), Commonwealth v. Wagner, 364 Pa. 566, 73 A. 2d 676 (1950).

In the instant case the Judge failed to make findings of fact, and it is therefore not possible for an appellate court to review the resultant order. When the proper procedure is not followed, the matter should be remanded so that the court below may discharge its responsibility. Commonwealth v. Strobel, 375 Pa. 292, 100 A. 2d 43 (1953), Commonwealth v. Strobel, 378 Pa. 84, 105 A. 2d 152 (1954).

Furthermore, the rather incredible time sequence and surrounding circumstances as alleged by the appellant necessitates definitive and clear findings of fact. The failure on the part of the Judge below to so comport requires us to remand.

Therefore, in keeping with this opinion we issue the following

ORDER

And Now, March 9, 1971, this case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County for disposition in accordance with the above opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Lee
5 Pa. D. & C.3d 321 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Verna
351 A.2d 694 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Critchfield
305 A.2d 748 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Department of Transportation v. Williams
284 A.2d 521 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. McCartney
279 A.2d 77 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.2d 777, 1 Pa. Commw. 376, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-milspaw-pacommwct-1971.