Commonwealth v. Mills
This text of 3 Pa. Super. 171 (Commonwealth v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The defendant in this case entered a plea of guilty to an indictment charging an escape from a jailer at the same time and in the same manner as the defendant in the case of the Commonwealth v. John Adams, decided at the present term. The cases involved the same questions and were argued together. For the reasons given in that case the assignment of error here is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Pa. Super. 171, 1896 Pa. Super. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mills-pasuperct-1896.