Commonwealth v. Miller

272 A.2d 735, 217 Pa. Super. 335, 1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1288
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 30, 1970·No. Appeal, No. 391·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant filed a PCHA petition in the court below attacking the validity of his guilty pleas. The PCHA court granted petitioner the right to appeal, but did not pass upon the validity of the guilty pleas. In such cases, the PCHA court should permit an amended petition, setting forth all claims petitioner wishes to raise with respect to his conviction and sentence, and proceed to hear them if nonfrivolous and not clearly refuted by the record. Commonwealth v. Lowery, 438 Pa. 89, 263 A. 2d 332 (1970); Commonwealth v. Williams, 216 Pa. Superior Ct. 355, 267 A. 2d 880 (1970).

Order reversed and record remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Wright, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Miller, 272 A.2d 735, 217 Pa. Super. 335, 1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1288 (Pa. Ct. App. 1970).

272 A.2d 735 (Commonwealth v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Lowery
263 A.2d 332 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Williams
267 A.2d 880 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)