Commonwealth v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Miller

824 A.2d 298, 573 Pa. 243, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 852

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 23, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 824 A.2d 298 (Commonwealth v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Miller, 824 A.2d 298, 573 Pa. 243, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 852 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The initial order granting petitioner leave to appeal nunc pro tunc granted him 60 days to file that appeal. See Order dated 12/21/99 (filed 11/14/01). As the appeal was filed within that 60 day period, the Superior Court’s quashal order is VACATED and the appeal is REMANDED for consideration on the merits.

Justice SAYLOR files a concurring statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The initial order granting petitioner leave to appeal nunc pro tunc granted him 60 days to file that appeal. See Order dated 12/21/99 (filed 11/14/01). As the appeal was filed within that 60 day period, the Superior Court’s quashal order is VACATED and the appeal is REMANDED for consideration on the merits.

Justice SAYLOR files a concurring statement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

824 A.2d 298, 573 Pa. 243, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-miller-pa-2003.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack