Commonwealth v. Mendez

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Mendez

37 A.3d 588, 614 Pa. 327, 2012 WL 414544, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 273

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Mendez. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.3d 250 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 10, 2012·No. No. 139 EM 2010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for the trial court to determine, within 90 days of this order, whether Petitioner was abandoned by counsel following the Superior Court’s decision. See Pa. R.Crim.P. 904(F)(2). In the event the trial court determines that Petitioner was abandoned, counsel of record is directed to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc within 30 days of the trial court’s order authorizing such relief. Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for the trial court to determine, within 90 days of this order, whether Petitioner was abandoned by counsel following the Superior Court’s decision. See Pa. R.Crim.P. 904(F)(2). In the event the trial court determines that Petitioner was abandoned, counsel of record is directed to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc within 30 days of the trial court’s order authorizing such relief. Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Commonwealth v. Mendez, 37 A.3d 588, 614 Pa. 327, 2012 WL 414544, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 273 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

37 A.3d 588 (Commonwealth v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.