Commonwealth v. Melanson
This text of 369 N.E.2d 1029 (Commonwealth v. Melanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, citing one case of no particular relevance to his appeal, challenges the constitutionality of G. L. c. 152, § 25C, under which he, as treasurer of a corporation which failed to provide for payment of workmen’s compensation to its employees, was prosecuted and fined. See Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Merrimac Mills Co., 325 Mass. 676, 679 (1950). That section is not vague or ambiguous in any respect identified by the defendant (compare G. L. c. 149, § 148, fourth and sixth pars.; G. L. c. 151A, 147); nor is the complaint, which tracks the statutory language. The appeal is utterly without merit, and, if this were a civil case, we should not hesitate to assess double costs and counsel fees.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 N.E.2d 1029, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 893, 1977 Mass. App. LEXIS 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-melanson-massappct-1977.