Commonwealth v. Meighan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Meighan

396 A.2d 475, 262 Pa. Super. 43, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4356

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 28, 1978

DocketNo. 135

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 396 A.2d 475 (Commonwealth v. Meighan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Meighan, 396 A.2d 475, 262 Pa. Super. 43, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4356 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

On direct appeal, appellant is challenging the voluntariness of his guilty plea without having first filed a petition with the lower court to withdraw the plea as required by Commonwealth v. Roberts, 237 Pa.Super. 336, 352 A.2d 140 (1975). On the record, at time of sentencing, the court informed the appellant that he had a right to file a motion to withdraw his plea within thirty days, and a right to appeal a denial thereof. However, the record is devoid of warnings to appellant of the consequences on appeal of his failure to file a petition to withdraw his guilty plea prior to challenging its validity. Under Commonwealth v. Johnson, 258 Pa.Super. 214, 392 A.2d 760 (1978), there must be affirmative proof on the record that “appellant had been apprised by the lower court or his counsel of the right to petition to withdraw his guilty plea, of the right to the assistance of counsel in filing such a petition, and of the consequences of not filing such a petition” before there can be a finding of waiver.

The judgment of sentence is, therefore, vacated, and the case remanded for the filing of a petition nunc pro tunc as mandated by Commonwealth v. Johnson.

HESTER, J., files a dissenting statement, in which VAN der VOORT, J., joins. HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On direct appeal, appellant is challenging the voluntariness of his guilty plea without having first filed a petition with the lower court to withdraw the plea as required by Commonwealth v. Roberts, 237 Pa.Super. 336, 352 A.2d 140 (1975). On the record, at time of sentencing, the court informed the appellant that he had a right to file a motion to withdraw his plea within thirty days, and a right to appeal a denial thereof. However, the record is devoid of warnings to appellant of the consequences on appeal of his failure to file a petition to withdraw his guilty plea prior to challenging its validity. Under Commonwealth v. Johnson, 258 Pa.Super. 214, 392 A.2d 760 (1978), there must be affirmative proof on the record that “appellant had been apprised by the lower court or his counsel of the right to petition to withdraw his guilty plea, of the right to the assistance of counsel in filing such a petition, and of the consequences of not filing such a petition” before there can be a finding of waiver.

The judgment of sentence is, therefore, vacated, and the case remanded for the filing of a petition nunc pro tunc as mandated by Commonwealth v. Johnson.

HESTER, J., files a dissenting statement, in which VAN der VOORT, J., joins. HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 A.2d 475, 262 Pa. Super. 43, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-meighan-pasuperct-1978.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack