Commonwealth v. Medina, J. Pets.
This text of Commonwealth v. Medina, J. Pets. (Commonwealth v. Medina, J. Pets.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 4 EM 2021 : Respondent : : : v. : : : JOAB MEDINA, SHAROME SMITH, : GEORGE ADAMS, SEAN MCCLEASE AND : MATTHEW HOUSTON, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2021, the “Application for Leave of Court to File
a Reply to Answer of Respondent the First Judicial District to the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus and/or Extraordinary Relief” is GRANTED. The Application for Leave to
File Original Process and the “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and/or Extraordinary
Relief” are DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Medina, J. Pets., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-medina-j-pets-pa-2021.