Commonwealth v. Mecca Cooperative Co.
60 Pa. Super. 314, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 188
Opinion
Opinion by
The ten assignments of error presented for our consideration are duplicates of the exceptions argued before the court below, and are so conclusively answered iri the opinion filed by Judge McMichael, that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Mecca Cooperative Co., 60 Pa. Super. 314, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 188 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).
60 Pa. Super. 314 (Commonwealth v. Mecca Cooperative Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Polokow
32 Pa. D. & C.2d 547 (Lehigh County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1963)
Commonwealth v. Cano
133 A.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Commonwealth v. Cano
128 A.2d 358 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
United Retail Employees of America, Local No. 134 v. W. T. Grant Co.
17 A.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Heiman
190 A. 479 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Commonwealth v. Dietz
132 A. 572 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Employment of Women ex rel. Foreign Consul
7 Pa. D. & C. 261 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1925)
Commonwealth v. Morris
2 Pa. D. & C. 19 (Fayette County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1922)
Mountain v. Commonwealth
68 Pa. Super. 100 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)