Commonwealth v. M'Clenegan

General Court of Virginia

Commonwealth v. M'Clenegan

1 Va. Cas. 155, 3 Va. 155, 1808 Va. LEXIS 1

General Court of Virginia·Decided June 11, 1808·Published

Opinion

The point adjourned in this case sufficiently appears from the opinion of the court.

June 11th, 1808, present judges Tyler, Nelson, White, Stuart, Brooke and Holmes. “The court are unanimously of opinion that where an indictment or presentment 156 *is found by a grand jury against any person for a misdemeanor to which the law has affixed an infamous or corporal punishment, the court before whom such indictment or presentment is found, may, in its discretion, award a capias in the first instance ; and that upon indictments and presentments of an inferior nature, such court ought, after two venire faciases have been returned not found, to award a capias. ’ ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The point adjourned in this case sufficiently appears from the opinion of the court.

June 11th, 1808, present judges Tyler, Nelson, White, Stuart, Brooke and Holmes. “The court are unanimously of opinion that where an indictment or presentment 156 *is found by a grand jury against any person for a misdemeanor to which the law has affixed an infamous or corporal punishment, the court before whom such indictment or presentment is found, may, in its discretion, award a capias in the first instance ; and that upon indictments and presentments of an inferior nature, such court ought, after two venire faciases have been returned not found, to award a capias. ’ ’

Commonwealth v. M'Clenegan, 1 Va. Cas. 155, 3 Va. 155, 1808 Va. LEXIS 1 (Va. Super. Ct. 1808).

Pincite

1 Va. Cas. 155 (Commonwealth v. M'Clenegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.