Commonwealth v. McKnight
This text of 190 A.2d 363 (Commonwealth v. McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In Commonwealth v. Meehan, 409 Pa. 616, 187 A. 2d 579 (1963), the Supreme Court granted a new trial to the present appellant’s co-defendant Meehan because of the potentiality of harm to him arising from the fact that he and McKnight were represented by the same counsel although there was a serious conflict of interest between them as set forth in the dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Meehan, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 558, at p. 567, 182 A. 2d 212, at p. 217 (1962). For similar reasons a new trial is required for McKnight also.
The judgment is reversed and a new trial is ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.2d 363, 201 Pa. Super. 14, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcknight-pasuperct-1963.