Commonwealth v. McKenna
This text of 125 Mass. 397 (Commonwealth v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record shows that in the District Court the defendant, being duly arraigned, stood mute, and upon a full hearing was found guilty. The statute provides that, if, on arraignment, a person refuses to plead, “the court shall order a plea of not guilty to be entered, and thereupon the proceedings shall be the same as if he had pleaded' not guilty.” Gen. Sts. c. 171, § 29. The defendant, having had full opportunity to plead in the District Court, and having refused to' do so, was by this statute to be tried as if he had pleaded not guilty; and having been so tried, the want of a formal entry of such a plea upon the record did not prejudice him and was no error. Ellenwood v. Commonwealth, 10 Met. 222. Harris's case, Cro. Jac. 502. The announcement by the clerk to the jury in' the Superior Court was according to the legal effect of the proceedings below, and his statement that the defendant had pleaded not guilty was, at the most, an informality that was waived by going to trial. Commonwealth v. McCauley, 105 Mass. 69.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 Mass. 397, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mckenna-mass-1878.