Commonwealth v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. McIntosh

922 A.2d 873, 592 Pa. 7, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 789

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 10, 2007·No. Petition No. 592 EAL 2006·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2007, it is hereby ordered that Petitioner’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The order entered on November 6, 2006 by the Superior Court is vacated as to the remand to a different judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. See Commonwealth v. Whitmore, 912 A.2d 827 (Pa.2006). The November 6, 2006 order of the Superior Court is affirmed in all other respects. Petitioner’s Application for Relief Requesting Permission to File a Reply to the Commonwealth’s Brief Opposing Petition for Allowance of Appeal Filed in this Case is denied.

Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2007, it is hereby ordered that Petitioner’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The order entered on November 6, 2006 by the Superior Court is vacated as to the remand to a different judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. See Commonwealth v. Whitmore, 912 A.2d 827 (Pa.2006). The November 6, 2006 order of the Superior Court is affirmed in all other respects. Petitioner’s Application for Relief Requesting Permission to File a Reply to the Commonwealth’s Brief Opposing Petition for Allowance of Appeal Filed in this Case is denied.

Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. McIntosh, 922 A.2d 873, 592 Pa. 7, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 789 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

922 A.2d 873 (Commonwealth v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related