Commonwealth v. McHugh
18 N.E. 74, 147 Mass. 401, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 118
Opinion
The fact that the officers, upon entering the defendant’s kitchen, saw upon the table a bottle which appeared to contain whiskey, and a tumbler, was clearly competent. It was also competent to show what became of it, as a part of the res gestee, and to account for not producing it in court. Besides, the fact that the defendant permitted a person present to throw it out of the window, without any objection, is a significant indication that he did not have the bottle of whiskey for any innocent purpose.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. McHugh, 18 N.E. 74, 147 Mass. 401, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 118 (Mass. 1888).
18 N.E. 74 (Commonwealth v. McHugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. Commonwealth
262 S.W. 1105 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Sullivan
31 N.E. 647 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Commonwealth v. Gillon
18 N.E. 584 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)