Commonwealth v. McGrath
This text of 115 Mass. 150 (Commonwealth v. McGrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This indictment duly charges an assault with intent to maim. The verdict, as recorded, shows a good conviction of a simple assault only, and is not affected by the misrecital of it in the defendants’ motion. The defendants having been convicted of part of the offence charged, and that part being of itself an offence substantially alleged in the indictment, they are liable to be sentenced accordingly. Gen. Sts. e. 172, § 16.
Exceptions overruled.
“When a person indicted for a felony is on trial acquitted by the verdict of part of the offence charged, and convicted of the residue, such verdict may be received and recorded by the court, and thereupon the person indicted shall be adjudged guilty of the offence, if any, which appears to the court to be substantially charged by the residue of the indictment, and shall be sentenced and punished accordingly.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 Mass. 150, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcgrath-mass-1874.