Commonwealth v. McGoodwin

268 S.W. 548, 206 Ky. 762, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 1043
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 23, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 S.W. 548 (Commonwealth v. McGoodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. McGoodwin, 268 S.W. 548, 206 Ky. 762, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 1043 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Opinión op the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Dismissing appeal.

This court takes judicial notice of who are the officials of the several counties. It therefore knows judicially that the appellant, S. D. Hodge, former county attorney of Caldwell county, who instituted this action and prosecutes this appeal on relation, in the name of the. Commonwealth, no longer occupies that position, and that the same is now held by another.

The relief sought in his action was a mandatory injunction against the circuit court clerk of Caldwell county and his deputy requiring them to permit him as county attorney the privilege and right to examine and compare the jury lists made by the judge of the circuit court at the June term, 1924, and filed in the clerk’s office, with the copy of such lists furnished by the clerk of the circuit court to the sheriff of that county and returned to the clerk’s office on the first day of the October term of the Caldwell circuit court, to the end that he as county [763]*763attorney might more efficiently represent and protect the interests of the Commonwealth upon the trial of causes pending in the court in which the Commonwealth was interested.

Manifestly if the judgment of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer to and dismissing his petition should be reversed by this court, and he should in the end be granted all the relief sought, that relief would be of no practical value to him or to the Commonwealth, because he, not now being county attorney, could not avail himself of the information so obtained or benefit the Commonwealth by the acquisition of such information.

His successor in office has not ashed to be substituted as appellant in this court, and presumably therefore does not share in his desire to prosecute this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Weaks
318 S.W.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 S.W. 548, 206 Ky. 762, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcgoodwin-kyctapp-1925.