Commonwealth v. McFall

257 A.2d 847, 436 Pa. 329, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 668
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 20, 1969
Docket3095-A Miscellaneous Docket
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 257 A.2d 847 (Commonwealth v. McFall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. McFall, 257 A.2d 847, 436 Pa. 329, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 668 (Pa. 1969).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant’s counsel in the Superior Court filed a brief which was merely a xeroxed copy of a brief wholly prepared by appellant himself. This clearly constitutes a denial of appellant’s right to effective assistance of counsel on his appeal. Commonwealth v. Villano, 435 Pa. 273, 256 A. 2d 468 (1969). The judgment of the Superior Court is therefore vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reeves
272 A.2d 197 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Stein
260 A.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.2d 847, 436 Pa. 329, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcfall-pa-1969.