Commonwealth v. McFall
257 A.2d 847, 436 Pa. 329, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 668
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 20, 1969·No. 3095-A Miscellaneous Docket·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Opinion
Appellant’s counsel in the Superior Court filed a brief which was merely a xeroxed copy of a brief wholly prepared by appellant himself. This clearly constitutes a denial of appellant’s right to effective assistance of counsel on his appeal. Commonwealth v. Villano, 435 Pa. 273, 256 A. 2d 468 (1969). The judgment of the Superior Court is therefore vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. McFall, 257 A.2d 847, 436 Pa. 329, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 668 (Pa. 1969).
257 A.2d 847 (Commonwealth v. McFall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Reeves
272 A.2d 197 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Stein
260 A.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)