Commonwealth v. McDermott

73 A. 427, 224 Pa. 362, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 647
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 12, 1908
DocketNo. 1; Appeals, Nos. 194 and 195
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 73 A. 427 (Commonwealth v. McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. McDermott, 73 A. 427, 224 Pa. 362, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 647 (Pa. 1908).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

These appeals were manifestly taken for the purpose of re-arguing the question of the constitutionality of the Act of May 29,1901, P. L. 327, prohibiting the manufacture and sale of oleomargarine, butterine and other similar products when colored in imitation of yellow butter. We ought hardly to be again called upon to declare that act constitutional. In Commonwealth v. Caulfield, 211 Pa. 644, we said there was no reason “why we should stuff the reports” with a repetition of the decisions sustaining it.

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgments of the Superior Court are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Graeff
13 A.3d 516 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Trotter v. Hendrick
177 A.2d 162 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Poppe v. State
52 N.W.2d 422 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Palarino
77 A.2d 665 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Dye v. Skeen
62 S.E.2d 681 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1950)
Commonwealth v. Balles
62 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Joyner v. State
30 So. 2d 304 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
State v. Brady
137 P.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1943)
People v. Klemick
36 N.E.2d 846 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1941)
Coleman v. Commonwealth
125 S.W.2d 728 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
State ex rel. Hunter v. Jurgensen
280 N.W. 886 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1938)
Emmertson v. State Tax Commission
72 P.2d 467 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)
Alexander's Administrator v. Kentucky Bankers Ass'n
35 S.W.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Holst v. Owens
24 F.2d 100 (Fifth Circuit, 1928)
State v. Bailey
115 So. 613 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
State v. Jones
244 P. 395 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Gani
102 So. 318 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1924)
People v. Rose
219 P. 1043 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
Singer v. United States
278 F. 415 (Third Circuit, 1922)
United States v. Lindquist
285 F. 447 (W.D. Washington, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A. 427, 224 Pa. 362, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcdermott-pa-1908.