Commonwealth v. McDermott
This text of 73 A. 427 (Commonwealth v. McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
These appeals were manifestly taken for the purpose of re-arguing the question of the constitutionality of the Act of May 29,1901, P. L. 327, prohibiting the manufacture and sale of oleomargarine, butterine and other similar products when colored in imitation of yellow butter. We ought hardly to be again called upon to declare that act constitutional. In Commonwealth v. Caulfield, 211 Pa. 644, we said there was no reason “why we should stuff the reports” with a repetition of the decisions sustaining it.
The assignments of error are overruled and the judgments of the Superior Court are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A. 427, 224 Pa. 362, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcdermott-pa-1908.