Commonwealth v. McDermott
This text of 123 Mass. 440 (Commonwealth v. McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant Malone, while held in custody, had a right to keep silence as to the crime with which he was charged, and all circumstances connected with it, and was not called upon to reply to or contradict any statements made in his hearing. No inference against him was warranted by his failure to deny the truth of what McDermott said to the officer. Commonwealth v. Kenney, 12 Met. 235. Commonwealth v. Walker, 13 Allen, 570. The conversation between the officer and McDermott was therefore inadmissible against Malone, and he was entitled to the ruling asked for. The learned judge who tried the case erred in submitting to the jury the question whether the silence of Malone was an admission of the truth of the answer of McDermott, and the entry must be
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 Mass. 440, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcdermott-mass-1877.