Commonwealth v. McCue
This text of 82 Mass. 226 (Commonwealth v. McCue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony of Higgins that he was a field-driver and had acted as such implies that he acted under the belief that he had been legally elected and qualified; and it was submitted to the jury with proper instructions. It was sufficient prima facie evidence that he was an officer de facto. 1 Phil. Ev. (4th Amer. ed.) 592 & notes. 1 Greenl. Ev. §§ 83, 92, & notes.
[228]*228The jury were also instructed correctly that it made no difference in the case that Higgins demanded or offered to take illegal fees. The evidence offered on that point did not tend to establish any justification for an assault and battery.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 Mass. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mccue-mass-1860.