Commonwealth v. McCoy

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. McCoy

538 A.2d 641, 114 Pa. Commw. 216, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 268

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 2, 1988

DocketAppeal, No. 2832 C.D. 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 538 A.2d 641 (Commonwealth v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. McCoy, 538 A.2d 641, 114 Pa. Commw. 216, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 268 (Pa. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which sustained the appeal of Thomas Michael McCoy (appellee) from the suspension of his operating privileges, for driving without a license. We reverse and reinstate the suspension of appellees operating privileges.

Appellee was convicted on July 3, 1985, of violating section 1501(a) of the Vehicle Code (Code), .75 Pa. C. S. § 1501(a), driving without a license. On February 18, 1986, more than seven months after conviction, appellee received notice from DOT that his license was suspended.

The trial court rescinded the order of DOT, holding that DOT’s notification was untimely, relying on Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Lewis, 506 Pa. 96, 484 A.2d 370 (1984). This reliance was misplaced. Lewis dealt with the accumulation of points and provided that suspension shall be made within six months following conviction and that failure to give such notice shall prohibit suspension, pursuant to section 1551 of the Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §1551 (notice of suspension as a result of the accumulation of points).

Here, on the other hand, appellee is not faced with a suspension due to points accumulation. Section 1501 of the Code provides that a driver must have a license to drive a motor vehicle, and section 1532(b)(2) of the Code provides that DOT shall suspend the operating privileges of any driver upon receiving a certified record of a driver’s conviction under section 1501(a) of the Code. Section 1532 of the Code is distinguished from [218]*218section 1551 in that it does not contain notice requirements as does section 1551. Horner v. Department of Transportation, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 519, 430 A.2d 387 (1981).

Accordingly, we reverse. The- suspension of appellees operating privileges is reinstated.

Order

Now, March 2, 1988, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, in No. 3794, March Term, 1986, dated August 13, 1986, is reversed. The suspension of appellees operating privileges is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which sustained the appeal of Thomas Michael McCoy (appellee) from the suspension of his operating privileges, for driving without a license. We reverse and reinstate the suspension of appellees operating privileges.

Appellee was convicted on July 3, 1985, of violating section 1501(a) of the Vehicle Code (Code), .75 Pa. C. S. § 1501(a), driving without a license. On February 18, 1986, more than seven months after conviction, appellee received notice from DOT that his license was suspended.

The trial court rescinded the order of DOT, holding that DOT’s notification was untimely, relying on Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Lewis, 506 Pa. 96, 484 A.2d 370 (1984). This reliance was misplaced. Lewis dealt with the accumulation of points and provided that suspension shall be made within six months following conviction and that failure to give such notice shall prohibit suspension, pursuant to section 1551 of the Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §1551 (notice of suspension as a result of the accumulation of points).

Here, on the other hand, appellee is not faced with a suspension due to points accumulation. Section 1501 of the Code provides that a driver must have a license to drive a motor vehicle, and section 1532(b)(2) of the Code provides that DOT shall suspend the operating privileges of any driver upon receiving a certified record of a driver’s conviction under section 1501(a) of the Code. Section 1532 of the Code is distinguished from [218]*218section 1551 in that it does not contain notice requirements as does section 1551. Horner v. Department of Transportation, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 519, 430 A.2d 387 (1981).

Accordingly, we reverse. The- suspension of appellees operating privileges is reinstated.

Order

Now, March 2, 1988, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, in No. 3794, March Term, 1986, dated August 13, 1986, is reversed. The suspension of appellees operating privileges is reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 A.2d 641, 114 Pa. Commw. 216, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mccoy-pacommwct-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack