Commonwealth v. McCluskey

116 Mass. 64, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 21
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 28, 1874·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wells, J.

The jury were rightly instructed that if the defendant conveyed the liquors to Bliss, “ having reasonable cause to believe that Bliss intended to sell them to some one else in violation of law, he would be liable under this complaint.” The instruction accurately defines one mode by which the offence punishable by the St. of 1869, e. 415, § 39, may be committed. If the defendant was owner, and intended himself to make an illegal sale to Bliss, to whom he was conveying the liquors, he was guilty of an offence against the same statute in another mode, not charged in the complaint. But that would not prevent his conviction for violation of the statute in the mode for which he was prosecuted. Exception8 overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. McCluskey, 116 Mass. 64, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 21 (Mass. 1874).

116 Mass. 64 (Commonwealth v. McCluskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loomis v. United States
61 F.2d 653 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)