Commonwealth v. McClive

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. McClive

397 A.2d 834, 263 Pa. Super. 236, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1866

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 16, 1979·No. Appeal No. 1207·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, February 16,1979, the petition to withdraw is denied. Counsel for appellant is directed either (1) to file a withdrawal brief meeting the description in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 108-09, 314 A.2d 513, 514-15 (1974), and Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 380 A.2d 1303 (1977), or (2) to proceed with the appeal by filing an advocate’s brief on the merits. In either case, counsel is to file a new brief within thirty (30) days, or risk sanctions.

JACOBS, former President Judge, and HOFFMAN, J. did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, February 16,1979, the petition to withdraw is denied. Counsel for appellant is directed either (1) to file a withdrawal brief meeting the description in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 108-09, 314 A.2d 513, 514-15 (1974), and Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 380 A.2d 1303 (1977), or (2) to proceed with the appeal by filing an advocate’s brief on the merits. In either case, counsel is to file a new brief within thirty (30) days, or risk sanctions.

JACOBS, former President Judge, and HOFFMAN, J. did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. McClive, 397 A.2d 834, 263 Pa. Super. 236, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1866 (Pa. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

397 A.2d 834 (Commonwealth v. McClive) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related