Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 8, 2019·No. 119 EM 2018·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 119 EM 2018 :

:

v. :

:

:

MICHAEL MCCLENTON :

:

:

PETITION OF: CHERYL STURM :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2019, in consideration of the Application for Leave to Withdraw, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Michael McClenton’s present counsel should be permitted to withdraw.

If present counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any issues relative to Michael McClenton being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro se.

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its order regarding this remand within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C., (Pa. 2019).

Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C. (Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.