Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C.
This text of Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C. (Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 119 EM 2018 : : v. : : : MICHAEL MCCLENTON : : : PETITION OF: CHERYL STURM :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2019, in consideration of the Application for
Leave to Withdraw, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of
Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Michael McClenton’s present
counsel should be permitted to withdraw.
If present counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any
issues relative to Michael McClenton being appointed counsel or granted leave to
proceed pro se.
The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its
order regarding this remand within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its
determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. McClenton, M., of: Sturm, C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcclenton-m-of-sturm-c-pa-2019.