Commonwealth v. McClelland, D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. McClelland, D.

179 A.3d 2

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 11, 2018·No. 252 WAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, slightly rephrased for clarity, is:

[W]hether the Superior Court panel failed to properly apply and follow the legal precedent set forth in Commonwealth ex rel. Buchanan v. Verbonitz, [ 525 Pa. 413 ] 581 A.[2d]3d 172, 174-76 (Pa. 1990) in which five (5) Justices held that "fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, slightly rephrased for clarity, is:

[W]hether the Superior Court panel failed to properly apply and follow the legal precedent set forth in Commonwealth ex rel. Buchanan v. Verbonitz, [ 525 Pa. 413 ] 581 A.[2d]3d 172, 174-76 (Pa. 1990) in which five (5) Justices held that "fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence."

Commonwealth v. McClelland, D., 179 A.3d 2 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

179 A.3d 2 (Commonwealth v. McClelland, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related