Commonwealth v. McClelland, D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. McClelland, D.

179 A.3d 2

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 11, 2018

Docket252 WAL 2017 (Granted)

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 179 A.3d 2 (Commonwealth v. McClelland, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. McClelland, D., 179 A.3d 2 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, slightly rephrased for clarity, is:

[W]hether the Superior Court panel failed to properly apply and follow the legal precedent set forth in Commonwealth ex rel. Buchanan v. Verbonitz, [ 525 Pa. 413 ] 581 A.[2d]3d 172, 174-76 (Pa. 1990) in which five (5) Justices held that "fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, slightly rephrased for clarity, is:

[W]hether the Superior Court panel failed to properly apply and follow the legal precedent set forth in Commonwealth ex rel. Buchanan v. Verbonitz, [ 525 Pa. 413 ] 581 A.[2d]3d 172, 174-76 (Pa. 1990) in which five (5) Justices held that "fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.3d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mcclelland-d-pa-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack