Commonwealth v. McCauley
This text of 7 Pa. Super. 395 (Commonwealth v. McCauley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In its main features, this case is undistinguishable from Commonwealth v. Murr, 7 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, except that the answers of the Avitnesses, who were asked, by the counsel for the Commonwealth, as to the reputation of the defendant’s house, [396]*396were favorable to her. For this reason and also for the reasons set forth in the decision in Commonwealth v. Murr, supra, this day handed down, the specifications of error, all whereof are similar to those in the case just referred to, must be overruled.
The judgment is affirmed and it is directed that the record be remitted to the court below, in order that the sentence may be enforced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Pa. Super. 395, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mccauley-pasuperct-1898.