Commonwealth v. McCarty

42 N.E. 336, 165 Mass. 37, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 11
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 30, 1895·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Field, C. J.

Whether the intent is well alleged or not, the indictment could not be quashed, and it was competent for the jury, under the indictment, to find the defendants guilty of a simple assault. Commonwealth v. Fischblatt, 4 Met. 354. Commonwealth v. Dean, 109 Mass. 349. Commonwealth v. Thompson, 116 Mass. 346. Commonwealth v. Kennedy, 131 Mass. 584.

We are inclined to think that the intent to ravish Catherine Webb is well alleged, whether the intent was that only one of the defendants should ravish her, or that all should in succession, although it is not necessary to decide this. Commonwealth v. Fogerty, 8 Gray, 489, 491. Pub. Sts. c. 210, § 3. State v. Comstock, 46 Iowa, 265. 1 Russ. Crimes, (9th Am. ed.) 920. Dennis v. State, 5 Ark. 230. Regina v. Crisham, C. & M. 187.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. McCarty, 42 N.E. 336, 165 Mass. 37, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 11 (Mass. 1895).

42 N.E. 336 (Commonwealth v. McCarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. McKay
294 N.E.2d 213 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1973)
Collins v. Commonwealth
51 N.E.2d 973 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
State v. Castner
119 A. 112 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1922)
Territory of Hawaii v. Schilling
17 Haw. 249 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1906)