Commonwealth v. McCarty
This text of 42 N.E. 336 (Commonwealth v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whether the intent is well alleged or not, the indictment could not be quashed, and it was competent for the jury, under the indictment, to find the defendants guilty of a simple assault. Commonwealth v. Fischblatt, 4 Met. 354. Commonwealth v. Dean, 109 Mass. 349. Commonwealth v. Thompson, 116 Mass. 346. Commonwealth v. Kennedy, 131 Mass. 584.
We are inclined to think that the intent to ravish Catherine Webb is well alleged, whether the intent was that only one of the defendants should ravish her, or that all should in succession, although it is not necessary to decide this. Commonwealth v. Fogerty, 8 Gray, 489, 491. Pub. Sts. c. 210, § 3. State v. Comstock, 46 Iowa, 265. 1 Russ. Crimes, (9th Am. ed.) 920. Dennis v. State, 5 Ark. 230. Regina v. Crisham, C. & M. 187.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 N.E. 336, 165 Mass. 37, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mccarty-mass-1895.