Commonwealth v. McCall

756 A.2d 670
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 11, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 756 A.2d 670 (Commonwealth v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. McCall, 756 A.2d 670 (Pa. 2000).

Opinion

[671]*671 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th dáy of August, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Was Petitioner rendered ineffective assistance of appellate counsel by virtue of counsel’s failure to brief and argue Petitioner’s subsequent acquittal of a prior crime used against him as evidence of motive and intent in the present case?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
756 A.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mccall-pa-2000.