Commonwealth v. Mattson
357 N.E.2d 30, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 856, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 662
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Mattson. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 Mass. App. Ct. 893 →
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape and has appealed. (G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G.) He assigns as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict on so much of the indictment as charged intent to rape. There was ample evidence which warranted the submission of the question of intent to the jury. No useful purpose would be served by restating that evidence. There was no error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Mattson, 357 N.E.2d 30, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 856, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 662 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).
357 N.E.2d 30 (Commonwealth v. Mattson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 33A-33G
Massachusetts § 33A-33G