Commonwealth v. Mattson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Commonwealth v. Mattson

357 N.E.2d 30, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 856, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 662

DecidedNovember 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 357 N.E.2d 30 (Commonwealth v. Mattson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Mattson, 357 N.E.2d 30, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 856, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 662 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape and has appealed. (G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G.) He assigns as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict on so much of the indictment as charged intent to rape. There was ample evidence which warranted the submission of the question of intent to the jury. No useful purpose would be served by restating that evidence. There was no error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape and has appealed. (G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G.) He assigns as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict on so much of the indictment as charged intent to rape. There was ample evidence which warranted the submission of the question of intent to the jury. No useful purpose would be served by restating that evidence. There was no error.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 N.E.2d 30, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 856, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mattson-massappct-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack