Commonwealth v. Matthews
55 A.3d 97, 618 Pa. 134, 2012 WL 4867432, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2420
This text of 55 A.3d 97 (Commonwealth v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Matthews, 55 A.3d 97, 618 Pa. 134, 2012 WL 4867432, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2420 (Pa. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
55 A.3d 97, 618 Pa. 134, 2012 WL 4867432, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-matthews-pa-2012.