Commonwealth v. Matthews
11 Ky. Op. 385, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 473
Opinion
Opinion by
It was not necessary for the defendant to make out for himself a prescription and preserve it as a protection from prosecution, because he proves that he was a regular physician, kept the drug store himself, and prescribed the medicine in good faith to Hagood. The court, in view of those facts, correctly instructed the jury.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Matthews, 11 Ky. Op. 385, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 473 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).
11 Ky. Op. 385 (Commonwealth v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lindsay v. Commonwealth
35 S.W. 269 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1896)