Commonwealth v. Matthew
884 A.2d 248, 584 Pa. 436, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2019
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth offered sufficient evidence to convict Petitioner of aggravated assault, graded as a felony of the first degree. In doing so, discuss the competing approaches contained in Commonwealth v. Mayo, 272 Pa.Super. 115, 414 A.2d 696 (1979) and Commonwealth v. Gruff, 822 A.2d 773 (Pa.Super.2003) and which approach, or other approach, should be adopted as the law of the Commonwealth with respect to this issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Matthew, 884 A.2d 248, 584 Pa. 436, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2019 (Pa. 2005).
884 A.2d 248 (Commonwealth v. Matthew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Matthew
909 A.2d 1254 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)