Commonwealth v. Martorano

244 N.E.2d 725, 355 Mass. 790, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 944
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 244 N.E.2d 725 (Commonwealth v. Martorano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Martorano, 244 N.E.2d 725, 355 Mass. 790, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 944 (Mass. 1969).

Opinion

At a . trial under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, of an indictment charging murder in the second degree of Maximiano Barretto, the defendant Martorano was found guilty of manslaughter. Of the argued assigned errors only a few merit even summary comment. Whether to propound a question to prospective jurors on the hypothesis that the defendant might not take the stand was in the discretion of the judge and not matter of right. G. L. c. 234, § 28. Commonwealth v. Taylor, 327 Mass. 641, 647. See Commonwealth v. Kiernan, 348 Mass. 29, 35-36. The evidence showed that on June 17, 1967, shortly after midnight, a series of arguments and fights involving the deceased and two men other than the defendant took place in the Ebbtide, a nightclub in Revere The defendant was restrained from participating. Shortly thereafter the three men and the defendant went to a nearby parking lot where they “squared off.” Out of a welter of conflicting testimony the jury could find that the defendant drew a pistol and fired two bullets at Barretto, killing him. Malice could be inferred from the act. Commonwealth v. Young, 326 Mass. 597, 600. The successive motions for a directed verdict were rightly denied. On another version of the evidence, if believed, a verdict of manslaughter was permissible. The defendant did not request the judge to rule that it was not. The issue was properly left to the jury. Commonwealth v. Kendrick, 351 Mass. 203, The judge’s charge, though general, was complete and correct in all essentials, including manslaughter. This being so, he was not required to charge on any “particular possible states of facts” or to frame his instructions in a form requested by counsel. Commonwealth v. Payne, 307 Mass. 56, 58. Commonwealth v. Rogers, 351 Mass. 522, 532. No error has been shown in the rulings on evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
773 N.E.2d 946 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Torres
651 N.E.2d 360 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Sinnott
507 N.E.2d 699 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1987)
Katz v. Winokur
433 N.E.2d 496 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1982)
Leech v. Ebers
429 N.E.2d 79 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Georgeou
429 N.E.2d 68 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Smith
305 N.E.2d 524 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Bumpus
290 N.E.2d 167 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Commonwealth v. Smith
258 N.E.2d 13 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 N.E.2d 725, 355 Mass. 790, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-martorano-mass-1969.