Commonwealth v. Martin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Martin

414 A.2d 351, 489 Pa. 484, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 663

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 479 Pa. 63 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 30, 1980·No. Appeal Nos. 30, 279·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s post-verdict motions, which contained some 43 assignments of error, were denied by the court below and found to be without merit. Appellant then appealed to this Court, raising an excess of 20 of these issues again. We have carefully reviewed these assignments of error, and we also find them to be without merit.

Consequently, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., concurred in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s post-verdict motions, which contained some 43 assignments of error, were denied by the court below and found to be without merit. Appellant then appealed to this Court, raising an excess of 20 of these issues again. We have carefully reviewed these assignments of error, and we also find them to be without merit.

Consequently, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., concurred in the result.

Commonwealth v. Martin, 414 A.2d 351, 489 Pa. 484, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 663 (Pa. 1980).

Pincite

414 A.2d 351 (Commonwealth v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.