Commonwealth v. Martin
This text of 38 N.E. 708 (Commonwealth v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case needs no discussion. The fact that there were in the defendant’s carpenter shop thirty-seven bottles of lager beer, seventy-three empty lager beer bottles, a four-gallon jug full of whiskey, another four-gallon jug containing about a quart of the same liquor, a tunnel, a corkscrew, and three bottles known as “ smugglers ” all smelling of whiskey, with the way in which these articles were placed in the shop, justified the verdict of guilty.
The thirty-seven bottles of lager beer were found in a dry-goods box and in a leather bag, those in the dry-goods box being in straw. The four-gallon jug which was full of whiskey was sealed with sealing wax, and stamped upon the sealing wax was the name “ Munroe & Co., 72 Broad St., Boston ” ; the partly empty jug was under a bench, covered with paper, and near the jugs were two tags, on one side of which was-written the defendant’s name, and on the other side was printed “ Munroe & Co., 72 Broad St., Boston.” The tunnel, corkscrew, and three bottles known as “smugglers ” were found in various places in the room.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 N.E. 708, 162 Mass. 402, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-martin-mass-1894.