Commonwealth v. Marks
This text of 413 A.2d 1036 (Commonwealth v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On July 1, 1977, appellant, Reginald Marks, was convicted of third degree murder in connection with a fatal shooting [109]*109following an altercation in the parking lot of a bar. Appellant presents three arguments on appeal: (1) that trial counsel was subject to a conflict of interest; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a third degree murder conviction; and (3) that appellant’s sentence reconsideration hearing was inadequate.
After careful review of the briefs and record, we have found these arguments to be without merit.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 A.2d 1036, 489 Pa. 108, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-marks-pa-1980.