Commonwealth v. Marks

413 A.2d 1036, 489 Pa. 108, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 600
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 25, 1980
DocketNo. 13
StatusPublished

This text of 413 A.2d 1036 (Commonwealth v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Marks, 413 A.2d 1036, 489 Pa. 108, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 600 (Pa. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

On July 1, 1977, appellant, Reginald Marks, was convicted of third degree murder in connection with a fatal shooting [109]*109following an altercation in the parking lot of a bar. Appellant presents three arguments on appeal: (1) that trial counsel was subject to a conflict of interest; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a third degree murder conviction; and (3) that appellant’s sentence reconsideration hearing was inadequate.

After careful review of the briefs and record, we have found these arguments to be without merit.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
413 A.2d 1036, 489 Pa. 108, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-marks-pa-1980.