Commonwealth v. Marinucci, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Marinucci, A.

170 A.3d 1010

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 24, 2017

DocketCommonwealth v. Marinucci, A., - No. 472 WAL 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.3d 1010 (Commonwealth v. Marinucci, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Marinucci, A., 170 A.3d 1010 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Batts, 163 A.3d 410, 2017 WL 2735411 (Pa. 2017), LIMITED TO the question of whether the instant judgment of sentence is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, and therefore an illegal sentence. Allowance of appeal is DENIED in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Batts, 163 A.3d 410, 2017 WL 2735411 (Pa. 2017), LIMITED TO the question of whether the instant judgment of sentence is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, and therefore an illegal sentence. Allowance of appeal is DENIED in all other respects.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.3d 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-marinucci-a-pa-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack