Commonwealth v. Marconi
13 A.3d 1291
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Marconi. Read the opinion of the Court — 619 Pa. 401 →
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of February 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Petitioner, is:
Whether Superior Court erred in ruling that sheriffs and their deputies lack authority to operate DUI checkpoints, and that [RJespondent’s arrest in that setting was therefore illegal, because that ruling conflicts with this Court’s unanimous decision in [Commonwealth, Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Kline, 741 A.2d 1281, 1282 (1999) ], upholding an arrest for DUI made by a deputy sheriff participating in a sheriff-run checkpoint, which was neither overturned nor modified by the Court’s subsequent decisions in [Kopko v. Miller, 586 Pa. 170, 892 A.2d 766 (2006) ] and [Commonwealth v. Dobbins, 594 Pa. 71, 934 A.2d 1170 (2007) ].
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Marconi, 13 A.3d 1291 (Pa. 2011).
13 A.3d 1291 (Commonwealth v. Marconi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kopko v. Miller
892 A.2d 766 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Commonwealth v. Dobbins
934 A.2d 1170 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Kline
741 A.2d 1281 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)