Commonwealth v. March

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. March

352 A.2d 65, 238 Pa. Super. 8, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2576

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 22, 1975

DocketAppeal, No. 878

StatusPublished

This text of 352 A.2d 65 (Commonwealth v. March) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. March, 352 A.2d 65, 238 Pa. Super. 8, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2576 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellants challenge their convictions under §4524 of the Penal Code¹ because §4524 does not specifically define “obscenity” as mandated by Miller v. California, [9]*9413 U.S. 15 (1973). In a companion case decided today, Commonwealth v. Krasner, 238 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 352 A.2d 479 (1975), we reversed Krasner’s conviction on the grounds alleged as error by appellants herein.

Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is reversed and appellants are discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellants challenge their convictions under §4524 of the Penal Code¹ because §4524 does not specifically define “obscenity” as mandated by Miller v. California, [9]*9413 U.S. 15 (1973). In a companion case decided today, Commonwealth v. Krasner, 238 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 352 A.2d 479 (1975), we reversed Krasner’s conviction on the grounds alleged as error by appellants herein.

Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is reversed and appellants are discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 A.2d 65, 238 Pa. Super. 8, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-march-pasuperct-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack