Commonwealth v. Malcolm, R.
This text of Commonwealth v. Malcolm, R. (Commonwealth v. Malcolm, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 418 EAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : RASHEED MALCOLM, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial court’s admission of Petitioner’s videotaped interrogation, over Petitioner’s objection?
(2) Where videotaped interrogations are sought to be admitted at trial, what steps should the parties and trial courts take to reduce undue prejudice while providing appropriate context so that jurors can appropriately weigh the evidence?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Malcolm, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-malcolm-r-pa-2024.