Commonwealth v. Maguire

190 A.3d 1130
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 7, 2018·No. No. 105 MAL 2018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

1. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in reversing the trial court's suppression of the evidence obtained during the commercial vehicle stop based upon failure to abide by the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines?
2. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in determining that the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines do not apply to commercial vehicle check-points?
3. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in failing to affirm the decision of the trial court on alternate grounds?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Maguire, 190 A.3d 1130 (Pa. 2018).

190 A.3d 1130 (Commonwealth v. Maguire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Maguire, J., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019